Regents Plan Next Steps for Growth Agenda

February 7th, 2010

S&W recommends the following article from Jack O’Meara of  PROFS — it goes beyond some of what we’ve seen in the regular press about the Regents’ recent initiatives:  Regents Plan Next Steps for Growth Agenda.

Generally speaking, we’re finding that the PROFS website is an excellent source of information and commentary about campus issues.  Not only do we recommend bookmarking the site, but we strongly encourage faculty who are not that familiar with PROFS to read more about PROFS here and consider joining.

- the Editors

Press coverage of the restructuring controversy

February 2nd, 2010

(Last updated Feb. 2, 2010)

Links to all relevant articles in the press, including some recent national coverage, are collected here in chronological order for the convenience of readers.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Chronicle mentions ASEC report on restructuring – and a reader replies.

January 25th, 2010

The Chronicle of Higher Education made brief mention of the Capital Times article on the report from the Academic Staff Executive Committee (ASEC) Ad Hoc committee on the Research Enterprise.  (Unfortunately, the Chronicle misattributed the report to the faculty, which has not yet issued its report on the same subject.)

Of greater interest than the Chronicle posting itself is one reader’s response, a short excerpt of which follows:

The real story here is not the restructuring of research supporting systems but the broader issue of disintegrating research administration infrastructures at Wisconsin, and indeed across the United States. Offices that manage sponsored programs (grants, contracts, research fellowships, etc.) universally have had flat budgets for the past decade, and yet this period saw an unprecedented growth in research funding (e.g., doubling of NIH grants) as well as a torrent of new regulatory requirements governing all aspects of research (electronic submission of proposals, research subjects, animal care, conflict of interest, export controls, accounting, reporting, auditing, technology transfer, etc.).

(continue reading comments)

From our vantage point at S&W at least, this is indeed a new perspective on the restructuring issue.   We hope more  readers will weigh in.

Eric Sandgren on the animal lab violations

January 22nd, 2010

For those S&W readers who missed it as well, it has just come to our attention (almost a week late) that the director of the Research Animal Resources Center, Eric Sandgren, offered his perspective on the news coverage of the recent citations in this guest editorial published on Jan. 16 by the online edition of the Wisconsin State Journal.

The original press reports were here and here.

For those seeking additional perspectives, we continue to recommend the lively (and lengthy) exchange that took place in the first week of January in the comments section of this post on the Sconz as well as these letters from the administration.

And in a late addendum to this post, we now have Todd Finkelmeyer’s (Capital Times) report, USDA returns but finds no issues with UW animal research.

Faculty Senate to vote on a resolution on “Smart Furloughs”.

January 22nd, 2010

At their February 1 meeting, the Faculty Senate will vote on a resolution brought by the Department of Physics.  The resolution voices strong support for the “Smart Furlough Bill” (AB 551) introduced by Rep. Kelda Helen Roys.   For those not already familiar with it, the Badger Herald reported on the bill in early November, and PROFS has expressed strong support (we were unable to find any coverage of the bill by the Wisconsin State Journal or the Capital Times).

We encourage S&W readers to become familiar with the “Smart Furlough Bill” and to post comments here.   In addition, those on the faculty should communicate their views on the resolution to their Faculty Senator(s).

The full text of the resolution is reproduced here: Read the rest of this entry »

The Academic Staff report on Graduate School restructuring

January 22nd, 2010

The first shoe has dropped.   The Academic  Staff Ad Hoc Committee on the Research Enterprise has returned its white paper.   Their charge was “[t]o assess whether the present UW-Madison Research Enterprise structure is capable of addressing current and future issues, or whether an alternative organizational structure such as that proposed by the Chancellor and the Provost is needed.”

Their unambiguous conclusions:  “yes” to the first question, and “no” to the second. Read the rest of this entry »

Encouraging signs concerning the Graduate School restructuring process

January 19th, 2010

Many of us have been waiting with bated breath for (a) the reports of the faculty and academic staff ad hoc committees on Provost Paul DeLuca’s proposal to divest the Graduate School of research functions, and (b) the administration’s response to those reports.

The reports were originally due at the end of last month.  The Badger Herald now reports that the due dates have been pushed back to January 21 in the case of the ASEC report and to the end of the month for the University Committee report. Read the rest of this entry »

Dramatic action in New York — could UW benefit from similar leadership?

January 17th, 2010

Yesterday, the office of Governor Paterson (New York) issued this press release: http://www.ny.gov/governor/press/press_01151001.html

The full text is reproduced below for the convenience of S&W readers.  While we have not had time to digest the details, our impression at first reading is that the problems facing the SUNY system are very comparable to those facing us here at UW and that similar dramatic action and creative leadership are urgently needed.  As always, reader comments are invited. Read the rest of this entry »

The administration responds to animal lab citations.

January 7th, 2010

The following letters from the administration provide another perspective on the recently reported animal lab citations:

January 4, 2010
To:      Deans and Directors
From:  Provost Paul M. DeLuca Jr. and Graduate School Dean Martin Cadwallader
Re:      USDA report on UW-Madison research animal programs

Recently, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) conducted a routine, unannounced inspection of UW-Madison research programs that involve animals used in research.

The inspection found a small number of instances where the university was not in full compliance with the federal rules and regulations.

Read the rest of this entry »

Reflections on the NY Times “engagement survey”.

January 5th, 2010

The education supplement of the NY TIMES 1/3/10 included a report on the National Survey of Student Engagement in 1200 college and universities. The Times reported on about 100 (visit this page, scroll down and look for heading ‘Engagement’ in the center column).

The survey examines “engagement” in significant facets of university life: time spent in preparing for class, extracurricular activity and for purposes here “quality of relationship with faculty” (helpfulness and availability).

Read the rest of this entry »