Comments on: The administration responds to animal lab citations. http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2010/01/07/the-administration-responds-to-animal-lab-citations/ An independent news and opinion page for the UW-Madison community Tue, 20 Jul 2010 23:09:03 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Grant given to fund research into Ebola and Marburg (using animals) « Thinking Outside The Skinner Box http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2010/01/07/the-administration-responds-to-animal-lab-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-3107 Grant given to fund research into Ebola and Marburg (using animals) « Thinking Outside The Skinner Box Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:57:13 +0000 http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=620#comment-3107 [...] “The administration responds to animal lab citations” at Sifting and Winnowing blog (January 7, 2010) [...] [...] “The administration responds to animal lab citations” at Sifting and Winnowing blog (January 7, 2010) [...]

]]> By: Admin http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2010/01/07/the-administration-responds-to-animal-lab-citations/comment-page-1/#comment-3106 Admin Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:30:23 +0000 http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=620#comment-3106 Looks like the folks at Channel 3 are on this story with a vengeance: http://www.channel3000.com/news/22166699/detail.html Is their reporting one-sided? One reporter we spoke with recently stated emphatically that it is "their job" to highlight the facts that will make the story look interesting. I inferred from this statement that their job also includes downplaying facts that make the story look less interesting. Looks like the folks at Channel 3 are on this story with a vengeance:

http://www.channel3000.com/news/22166699/detail.html

Is their reporting one-sided? One reporter we spoke with recently stated emphatically that it is “their job” to highlight the facts that will make the story look interesting. I inferred from this statement that their job also includes downplaying facts that make the story look less interesting.

]]>