Sifting and Winnowing

Moments ago, the Faculty Senate voted on the Resolution from the Department of  Sociology Regarding the Proposed Reorganization of the Graduate School. The vote was nearly unanimous — there was only a single opposing vote.

(more…)

At today’s meeting in Bascom Hall, the Faculty Senate will vote on this resolution submitted by the Sociology Department.  Unless we are completely misreading faculty sentiment across campus, it will likely pass by a large margin and will thereby reassert the faculty’s commitment to the tradition of shared governance at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

(more…)

I’m frustrated by the proposal to restructure the graduate school.  Indeed, I’m afraid of such action.

I’m frustrated that only one plan is presented. The Provost says at each Town Hall that he has looked at this in a variety of ways and that this is the only solution he can come to. Complex problems need to be addressed by a team of diverse capabilities, so it is not surprising that he came up with one solution, and likely not the best one.

I’m frustrated by the lack of broad faculty input in the development of a plan to address these problems. There is no involvement by the UC, the graduate school or academic staff in developing an appropriate plan.

I’m frustrated by Town Hall meetings and the inability of the Provost to answer questions at those meetings. Seriously, review the videos. Listen to the question and then the Provost’s response. Often his response is an anecdotal story that really doesn’t answer the question posed. Too many times does he say “I don’t see why you would think that.”

So, as Halloween approaches I thought I’d take on a scary costume.

(more…)

The following resolution is scheduled to be voted on by the Faculty Senate on Monday, November 2, 2009:

RESOLUTION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY REGARDING THE PROPOSED REORGANIZATION OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

(more…)

Chancellor Martin’s letter to the community indicates that she and the provost have accepted the shared governance process, belatedly. This is a positive development. So, in the spirit of shared governance let’s consider the administration’s proposal and see what we think about it.

The essence of the current proposal is to centralize control over our research enterprise by splitting research functions off from the Graduate School and consolidating them in a new office for research under a new vice-chancellor. The question of whether such centralization would be a good move can be broken down into two parts. First, what might we gain? Second, what could we lose?

(more…)