Archive for the ‘Restructuring proposal’ Category

The other shoe drops: UC Ad Hoc Committee report on the research enterprise.

Monday, February 22nd, 2010

As reported here and elsewhere,  the Academic Staff Executive Committee (ASEC) Ad Hoc Committee on the Research Enterprise already released its report back on January 22.

We had been waiting with bated breath for the counterpart committee appointed by the faculty’s University Committee (UC) to release its own findings on the same issue.  This report was originally due by the end of 2009, but this deadline could not be met.

The following message has just now  (2:50 pm today) been broadcast by the University Committee: (more…)

Press coverage of the restructuring controversy

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

(Last updated Feb. 2, 2010)

Links to all relevant articles in the press, including some recent national coverage, are collected here in chronological order for the convenience of readers.

(more…)

The Chronicle mentions ASEC report on restructuring – and a reader replies.

Monday, January 25th, 2010

The Chronicle of Higher Education made brief mention of the Capital Times article on the report from the Academic Staff Executive Committee (ASEC) Ad Hoc committee on the Research Enterprise.  (Unfortunately, the Chronicle misattributed the report to the faculty, which has not yet issued its report on the same subject.)

Of greater interest than the Chronicle posting itself is one reader’s response, a short excerpt of which follows:

The real story here is not the restructuring of research supporting systems but the broader issue of disintegrating research administration infrastructures at Wisconsin, and indeed across the United States. Offices that manage sponsored programs (grants, contracts, research fellowships, etc.) universally have had flat budgets for the past decade, and yet this period saw an unprecedented growth in research funding (e.g., doubling of NIH grants) as well as a torrent of new regulatory requirements governing all aspects of research (electronic submission of proposals, research subjects, animal care, conflict of interest, export controls, accounting, reporting, auditing, technology transfer, etc.).

(continue reading comments)

From our vantage point at S&W at least, this is indeed a new perspective on the restructuring issue.   We hope more  readers will weigh in.

The Academic Staff report on Graduate School restructuring

Friday, January 22nd, 2010

The first shoe has dropped.   The Academic  Staff Ad Hoc Committee on the Research Enterprise has returned its white paper.   Their charge was “[t]o assess whether the present UW-Madison Research Enterprise structure is capable of addressing current and future issues, or whether an alternative organizational structure such as that proposed by the Chancellor and the Provost is needed.”

Their unambiguous conclusions:  “yes” to the first question, and “no” to the second. (more…)

Encouraging signs concerning the Graduate School restructuring process

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Many of us have been waiting with bated breath for (a) the reports of the faculty and academic staff ad hoc committees on Provost Paul DeLuca’s proposal to divest the Graduate School of research functions, and (b) the administration’s response to those reports.

The reports were originally due at the end of last month.  The Badger Herald now reports that the due dates have been pushed back to January 21 in the case of the ASEC report and to the end of the month for the University Committee report. (more…)

Animal research lab violations and the Graduate School restructuring plan.

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Those readers who have been following the Graduate School restructuring controversy are  aware that, in response to widespread criticism of the process, all action on the proposed restructuring has been put on hold by the administration pending reports from ad hoc committees assembled by the Faculty Senate and by the Academic Staff Executive Committee (ASEC).  Those reports were due by New Year’s Eve, 2009, and their public release is therefore anticipated in the very near future, perhaps even this week.

We will be very surprised if the reports endorse the wholesale restructuring pushed by Provost Paul DeLuca and Chancellor Biddy Martin.   We will be equally surprised if either the provost or the chancellor readily back down from their plan, regardless of what the reports contain.

(more…)

A memo from Dean Sandefur (L&S) on the proposed reorganization of the Graduate School

Friday, November 13th, 2009

This memo by Dean Gary Sandefur (Letters and Sciences) was copied to L&S faculty, staff, and graduate students.  It is reproduced here for the convenience, and public comment, of S&W readers. – Eds.

(more…)

Letter from the Provost concerning restructuring

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

The following broadcast message from Provost Paul M. DeLuca, Jr., was received on November 11, 2009 and is reposted here for the convenience of S&W readers (a similar or identical message also appears on the Provost’s own website).  Public comments are strongly encouraged. – Eds.

November 11, 2009

Dear Faculty, Staff and Students:

As you know, we have been reaching out to get your views into the challenges that confront us as a research and learning community. A potential realignment of our research infrastructure has, not surprisingly, resonated in different ways with many of you. I write today to let you know that your comments and concerns will be important factors in any change that may be implemented. The strength of our university is derived primarily from the creativity and hard work of our faculty, staff and students. Without your efforts and inspiration, UW-Madison would not be the great university it is, and thus any substantive change to our research apparatus will occur only through the combined efforts of the campus community. (more…)

Resolution passes

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Moments ago, the Faculty Senate voted on the Resolution from the Department of  Sociology Regarding the Proposed Reorganization of the Graduate School. The vote was nearly unanimous — there was only a single opposing vote.

(more…)

Why the Faculty Senate should support the resolution

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

At today’s meeting in Bascom Hall, the Faculty Senate will vote on this resolution submitted by the Sociology Department.  Unless we are completely misreading faculty sentiment across campus, it will likely pass by a large margin and will thereby reassert the faculty’s commitment to the tradition of shared governance at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

(more…)