Archive for the ‘Letters and Sciences’ Category

Budget insanity: Are faculty telephones now luxuries?

Saturday, February 12th, 2011

My department in L&S, which isn’t large but nevertheless world-recognized for research and scholarship in its field, had a faculty meeting earlier this month to grapple with the assigned exercise of finding 8% that could plausibly be cut from our departmental budget.

The chair put up an overhead transparency itemizing all of the major components of our current annual budget.  Our challenge was to assemble enough proposed cuts in specific areas to reach our target, and we were specifically asked to do this in a way that “wouldn’t hurt students.”  The presumption apparently being that there must be 8% somewhere in our budget that has nothing to do with teaching or mentoring our undergraduate or graduate students and could be jettisoned without students ever noticing. (more…)

A memo from Dean Sandefur (L&S) on the proposed reorganization of the Graduate School

Friday, November 13th, 2009

This memo by Dean Gary Sandefur (Letters and Sciences) was copied to L&S faculty, staff, and graduate students.  It is reproduced here for the convenience, and public comment, of S&W readers. – Eds.

(more…)

New collective bargaining agreement for TAs, PAs

Friday, November 6th, 2009

We post here, unedited and without editorial comment, the complete text of an informational letter circulated by Letters & Sciences summarizing changes in the collective bargaining agreement for Teaching Assistants and Project Assistants, as signed recently by Governor Doyle.

(more…)

A skeptical audience for restructuring

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

The second town-hall style meeting was held today concerning the proposed restructuring of the Graduate School to split off its research-related functions into a separate administrative unit.    (If this issue is not yet on your radar screen, it should be — see here and here).

The meeting was well-attended, primarily by folks from Letters and Sciences this time since L&S was the nominal sponsor of this particular event.

Provost Paul DeLuca built his pitch around the following contentions:  (1) our “research structure is broken,” and, therefore,  (2) only the creation of a new administrative hierarchy, headed by a Vice Chancellor for Research who reports directly to the Chancellor, can save the University from the threat of a major meltdown.

(more…)