<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sifting and Winnowing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siftingandwinnowing.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org</link>
	<description>An independent news and opinion page for the UW-Madison community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UW-Madison&#8217;s primary mission is football. by Right Idea, Wrong Time &#124; Kelchen on Education</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2011/09/01/uw-madisons-primary-mission-is-football/comment-page-1/#comment-67166</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Idea, Wrong Time &#124; Kelchen on Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1637#comment-67166</guid>
		<description>[...] at, say, 4 PM instead of noon would allow for a much more normal day of classes. For reference, recall the hubbub about having a night football game on the Thursday before classes even started. I’m guessing that the folks complaining about a night football game aren’t complaining about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at, say, 4 PM instead of noon would allow for a much more normal day of classes. For reference, recall the hubbub about having a night football game on the Thursday before classes even started. I’m guessing that the folks complaining about a night football game aren’t complaining about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sifting and Winnowing goes dormant. by hc</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/09/16/sifting-and-winnowing-goes-dormant/comment-page-1/#comment-65791</link>
		<dc:creator>hc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1884#comment-65791</guid>
		<description>Hey sifters, are you sure NOW is the time you want to go dormant? Really?  We are not under a nice thick layer of deep snow. Rather there seems to be a volcano erupting right now.

Check out this gem from the UW System new personnel system. 
Most unfortunately the classified were way more prominent in the feedback category, they had a lot of anger towards faculty and staff, and this can be used against all of us most unfortunately in the future. And there&#039;s a lot of transfer between UW System personnel system and Madison personnel system. So just because this is System and not Madison is not a reason to ignore what System is doing. 

Like a rule against being &quot;discourteous&quot;. This is extremely subjective and further subject to discrimination. It is well known that women for example are held to different expectations of conduct than men.  What a man could get away with saying a woman could get dismissed for saying. 

http://web.uwsa.edu/assets/sites/personnel_structures/docs/proposed%20implementation%20docs/EE%205-Work%20Place%20Expectations.pdf
II. Regulations – Prohibited Conduct
A. Failure or refusal to carry out assignments or instructions.
B. Loafing, loitering, sleeping or engaging in unauthorized personal business.
C. Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information or records.
D. Failure to provide accurate and complete information whenever such information is required by an authorized person or entity.
E. Failure to comply with health, safety and sanitation requirements, rules and regulations.
F. Unexcused or excessive absenteeism.
G. Unauthorized or improper use of University property or equipment including vehicles, telephone, university keys or mail service.
H. Unauthorized possession or removal of University or another person&#039;s private property.
I. Unauthorized posting or removing of notices or signs from bulletin boards.
J. Threatening or doing bodily harm, intimidating, interfering with, or using abusive language towards others.
K. Unauthorized possession of weapons.
L. Making false or malicious statements concerning other employees, students or the University.
M. Use or reporting to work under the influence of alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs.
N. Unauthorized solicitation for any purpose.
O. Failure to exercise good judgment, or being discourteous, in dealing with fellow employees, students or the general public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey sifters, are you sure NOW is the time you want to go dormant? Really?  We are not under a nice thick layer of deep snow. Rather there seems to be a volcano erupting right now.</p>
<p>Check out this gem from the UW System new personnel system.<br />
Most unfortunately the classified were way more prominent in the feedback category, they had a lot of anger towards faculty and staff, and this can be used against all of us most unfortunately in the future. And there&#8217;s a lot of transfer between UW System personnel system and Madison personnel system. So just because this is System and not Madison is not a reason to ignore what System is doing. </p>
<p>Like a rule against being &#8220;discourteous&#8221;. This is extremely subjective and further subject to discrimination. It is well known that women for example are held to different expectations of conduct than men.  What a man could get away with saying a woman could get dismissed for saying. </p>
<p><a href="http://web.uwsa.edu/assets/sites/personnel_structures/docs/proposed%20implementation%20docs/EE%205-Work%20Place%20Expectations.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://web.uwsa.edu/assets/sites/personnel_structures/docs/proposed%20implementation%20docs/EE%205-Work%20Place%20Expectations.pdf</a><br />
II. Regulations – Prohibited Conduct<br />
A. Failure or refusal to carry out assignments or instructions.<br />
B. Loafing, loitering, sleeping or engaging in unauthorized personal business.<br />
C. Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information or records.<br />
D. Failure to provide accurate and complete information whenever such information is required by an authorized person or entity.<br />
E. Failure to comply with health, safety and sanitation requirements, rules and regulations.<br />
F. Unexcused or excessive absenteeism.<br />
G. Unauthorized or improper use of University property or equipment including vehicles, telephone, university keys or mail service.<br />
H. Unauthorized possession or removal of University or another person&#8217;s private property.<br />
I. Unauthorized posting or removing of notices or signs from bulletin boards.<br />
J. Threatening or doing bodily harm, intimidating, interfering with, or using abusive language towards others.<br />
K. Unauthorized possession of weapons.<br />
L. Making false or malicious statements concerning other employees, students or the University.<br />
M. Use or reporting to work under the influence of alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs.<br />
N. Unauthorized solicitation for any purpose.<br />
O. Failure to exercise good judgment, or being discourteous, in dealing with fellow employees, students or the general public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sifting and Winnowing goes dormant. by Admin</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/09/16/sifting-and-winnowing-goes-dormant/comment-page-1/#comment-64793</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1884#comment-64793</guid>
		<description>You can send email to admin@siftingandwinnowing.org

This page lists expenses to date:  http://siftingandwinnowing.org/expenses-and-donations/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can send email to <a href="mailto:admin@siftingandwinnowing.org">admin@siftingandwinnowing.org</a></p>
<p>This page lists expenses to date:  <a href="http://siftingandwinnowing.org/expenses-and-donations/" rel="nofollow">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/expenses-and-donations/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sifting and Winnowing goes dormant. by hc</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/09/16/sifting-and-winnowing-goes-dormant/comment-page-1/#comment-64792</link>
		<dc:creator>hc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 22:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1884#comment-64792</guid>
		<description>If you want people to volunteer how about some contact information?
BTW how much are you paying for hosting per year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want people to volunteer how about some contact information?<br />
BTW how much are you paying for hosting per year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State-ordered study of the Wisconsin Retirement System recommends no changes. by GP</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/07/02/state-ordered-study-of-the-wisconsin-retirement-system-recommends-no-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-49739</link>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1875#comment-49739</guid>
		<description>And now here&#039;s a blog post that accuses conservatives of systematically trying to push pension reform where none is needed:


&quot;Scott Walker, right-wing think tanks creating another crisis in public employee pensions&quot;

http://bdgrdemocracy.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/report-scott-walker-right-wing-think-tanks-creating-another-crisis-public-employee-pensions/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now here&#8217;s a blog post that accuses conservatives of systematically trying to push pension reform where none is needed:</p>
<p>&#8220;Scott Walker, right-wing think tanks creating another crisis in public employee pensions&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://bdgrdemocracy.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/report-scott-walker-right-wing-think-tanks-creating-another-crisis-public-employee-pensions/" rel="nofollow">http://bdgrdemocracy.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/report-scott-walker-right-wing-think-tanks-creating-another-crisis-public-employee-pensions/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State-ordered study of the Wisconsin Retirement System recommends no changes. by GP</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/07/02/state-ordered-study-of-the-wisconsin-retirement-system-recommends-no-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-49084</link>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 04:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1875#comment-49084</guid>
		<description>Looks like the conservative-leaning Wisconsin Reporter doesn&#039;t want to take good news at face value either -- they seem to be trying to gin up a case that the WRS is not as solvent as it looks:  
http://www.wisconsinreporter.com/wi-pensions-get-shock-treatment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the conservative-leaning Wisconsin Reporter doesn&#8217;t want to take good news at face value either &#8212; they seem to be trying to gin up a case that the WRS is not as solvent as it looks:<br />
<a href="http://www.wisconsinreporter.com/wi-pensions-get-shock-treatment" rel="nofollow">http://www.wisconsinreporter.com/wi-pensions-get-shock-treatment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State-ordered study of the Wisconsin Retirement System recommends no changes. by GP</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/07/02/state-ordered-study-of-the-wisconsin-retirement-system-recommends-no-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-48723</link>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1875#comment-48723</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or does Secretary of Administration Mike Huebsch&#039;s cover letter sound like he&#039;s praising the WRS through gritted teeth?

&quot;Taxpayers deserve to have the best and hardest working employees working for them.  The state employee workforce of the 21st Century may be more attentive to the portability of benefits and freedom offered by other retirement options.&quot;

I don&#039;t think we&#039;re out of the woods.  My read is, these guys still REALLY want to get their hands on the WRS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does Secretary of Administration Mike Huebsch&#8217;s cover letter sound like he&#8217;s praising the WRS through gritted teeth?</p>
<p>&#8220;Taxpayers deserve to have the best and hardest working employees working for them.  The state employee workforce of the 21st Century may be more attentive to the portability of benefits and freedom offered by other retirement options.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re out of the woods.  My read is, these guys still REALLY want to get their hands on the WRS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State-ordered study of the Wisconsin Retirement System recommends no changes. by Admin</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/07/02/state-ordered-study-of-the-wisconsin-retirement-system-recommends-no-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-48699</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1875#comment-48699</guid>
		<description>Here is a statement from Gov. Scott Walker in response to the report:  http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=273735

&quot;The report released today confirms that both taxpayers and pensioners are getting a great deal with the WRS. Compared to other states, Wisconsin consistently rates among the best performing public pension systems in the country.

&quot;Both the State of Wisconsin and WRS must be fiscally sustainable moving forward to ensure that we can meet our outstanding benefit obligations, which I am confident we can do. The long term structural changes we made last year will help ensure that the state iis able to fulfill the commitment it has made to pensioners.

&quot;I want to be very clear: I am currently not planning to make any substantial changes to the WRS. However, I will continue to work to ensure that the WRS is fiscally sustainable for both taxpayers and retirees.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a statement from Gov. Scott Walker in response to the report:  <a href="http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=273735" rel="nofollow">http://www.wispolitics.com/index.iml?Article=273735</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The report released today confirms that both taxpayers and pensioners are getting a great deal with the WRS. Compared to other states, Wisconsin consistently rates among the best performing public pension systems in the country.</p>
<p>&#8220;Both the State of Wisconsin and WRS must be fiscally sustainable moving forward to ensure that we can meet our outstanding benefit obligations, which I am confident we can do. The long term structural changes we made last year will help ensure that the state iis able to fulfill the commitment it has made to pensioners.</p>
<p>&#8220;I want to be very clear: I am currently not planning to make any substantial changes to the WRS. However, I will continue to work to ensure that the WRS is fiscally sustainable for both taxpayers and retirees.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Charter School for the University of Wisconsin? Questions about the new UW Flexible Degree Program by Frank Rojas</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/06/28/a-charter-school-for-the-university-of-wisconsin-questions-about-the-new-uw-flexible-degree-program/comment-page-1/#comment-48347</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1856#comment-48347</guid>
		<description>I am with the skeptics on this. Lots of promises and few answers. Is this another unfunded mandate typical of government low on funds? What exactly is the demand and actual value of such a degree? Are employers ready to line up for some generic UW System degree? Or is just another dubious credential of little/no real value? Has anyone analyzed the real value of such degrees to date? How do they compare to more traditional colleges?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with the skeptics on this. Lots of promises and few answers. Is this another unfunded mandate typical of government low on funds? What exactly is the demand and actual value of such a degree? Are employers ready to line up for some generic UW System degree? Or is just another dubious credential of little/no real value? Has anyone analyzed the real value of such degrees to date? How do they compare to more traditional colleges?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Urgent: Amendment to restrict government employee participation in scientific conferences by GP</title>
		<link>http://siftingandwinnowing.org/2012/06/21/urgent-amendment-to-restrict-government-employee-participation-in-scientific-conferences/comment-page-1/#comment-47585</link>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 03:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siftingandwinnowing.org/?p=1845#comment-47585</guid>
		<description>It appears that the gist of the restrictions in question are the following:

1) No more than 50 employees of any government agency may attend an international conference on foreign soil unless deemed in the national interest by the Secretary of State;

2) Total conference travel expenses paid by any agency in each of the fiscal years 2012-2016 may not exceed 80% of that paid in fiscal year 2010.

3) All conference materials, recordings, etc., presented by government conference-goers must be posted online in searchable form.

Here&#039;s a link to the amendment:  http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r112:1:./temp/~r112Q7qMxG:e86309:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the gist of the restrictions in question are the following:</p>
<p>1) No more than 50 employees of any government agency may attend an international conference on foreign soil unless deemed in the national interest by the Secretary of State;</p>
<p>2) Total conference travel expenses paid by any agency in each of the fiscal years 2012-2016 may not exceed 80% of that paid in fiscal year 2010.</p>
<p>3) All conference materials, recordings, etc., presented by government conference-goers must be posted online in searchable form.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the amendment:  <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r112:1" rel="nofollow">http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?r112:1</a>:./temp/~r112Q7qMxG:e86309:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
