You must delve more deeply into the governor’s proposals to cut the UW-System budget by $300 million in the coming biennium and to spin off the university from the state as a public authority (a semi-private entity like the UW-Hospitals and Clinics.)
Deals are being made, and it is hard to know what they are. There are potential benefits and extreme dangers for our institution and for shared governance.
Ask tough questions. The time for action is NOW – the governor will present his budget Feb. 3 and deals are being hammered out downtown as I write.
We need faculty to speak up at the Senate, to engage their students, and to seed discussion all across campus. To keep yourself informed visit PROFS, (Public Representation Organization of the Faculty Senate), visit BadgerFutures: Resources for Debates about UW-Madison’s Future on Facebook and follow @GlobalHigherEd on Twitter.
Please post additional relevant resources as comments below.
In light of the
tremendous challenges dire emergency facing the University of Wisconsin in the form of Governor Walker’s proposed $300 million budget cut to UW System and creation of a new public authority for UWS, we urgently need to expand the opportunities for stakeholders – faculty, staff, students, their parents, alumni, and business leaders – to help shape the public discussion about the future of the University of Wisconsin.
So, after many months of relative neglect, we are bringing S&W back to life and will once again actively seek contributions from across the UW community and from across the spectrum of ideas.
In addition to unsolicited contributions, we welcome volunteer co-editors who can help solicit and post submissions from a range of contributors.
Please be sure to read the mission statement and the instructions for authors.
And please speak up.
Update: Because the issues that confront UW-Madison are in many ways common to those confronting the other UW System campuses, we are at least temporarily broadening our scope to welcome news and commentary related to the effects of cuts and/or public authority on those other campuses.
If you haven’t done so, please read today’s WI State Journal article, “Splitting UW System, UW-Madison from state being discussed at Capitol,” which I pasted below and once you do so then consider the following questions.
If you objectively look at what took place during and after the “conversion” of the UWH&C you will understand the complexity of any conversion of the UW System. These questions also would apply if compromises are made and then select campuses or a single campus, such as UW-Madison, is proposed to become a public-private authority. Luckily a colleague who was involved in the UWH&C conversion helped me understand a wide array of significant issues which must be discussed. The person also explained that there are other large questions that must be identified and discussed, such as but not limited to: Continue reading
Chancellor Rebecca Blank has spoken recently of the desirability of raising out-of-state tuition to help make ends meet on the UW-Madison campus. Her proposal offers one of the few potentially viable pathways to budget stability in a landscape dominated by declining state support and a freeze on in-state tuition imposed by the legislature in the wake of the supposed reserve scandal. The Chancellor logically assumes that calls for higher tuition only on non-resident students will be more palatable to taxpayers and legislators than many alternative solutions might be. Continue reading
Everyone is busy, and few are busier today than the small group of idealists who conceived of this site at a holiday party in 2007 and then nursed it along over the past several years. We are simply unable to put in the time anymore, so either someone else would have had to pick up the torch, or Sifting and Winnowing would have to go dormant. By “dormant,” we mean no new postings, and when the commercial internet hosting contract expires in a year or so, the lights will go out completely.
An invitation was extended privately to several trusted individuals to take over management of S&W, the sole condition being that it would continue to serve as an open forum for anyone with an informed opinion about campus affairs, no matter what specific position they took. Perhaps not surprisingly, no one else had the time either. It’s not too late for someone to step up, but that no longer seems likely.
One long-time contributor suggested that S&W served its purpose during a particular moment in this University’s history, and “now it is time to lift the lid, toss it into the cybercloud and soon enough something else will fall out of the sky.”
We’ll all be watching for that “something else.”
Thanks for reading!
Today, the much-anticipated (and, by some, much-feared) report on the Act 32-mandated study of the Wisconsin Retirement System was released.
The introduction to the Executive Summary reads as follows:
The Wisconsin Retirement System (WRS) is an efficient and sustainable retirement system. According to the analysis prepared by Gabriel, Roeder, and Smith (the independent consulting actuary for the WRS), the WRS is insulated from large swings in annual contribution rates or funding levels due to the plan’s cost-sharing and risk-sharing features. For example, since the market collapse of 2008, annuities have been reduced by almost $3.2 billion. As a result, the WRS was able to weather much of the financial storm. Continue reading
The role of public higher education in a rapidly changing world rose to prominence last week with two developments: the University of Virginia’s governance debacle (see local commentary here) and the announcement of Gov. Scott Walker’s Flexible Online Degree initiative.
As noted in the previous article by another contributor, these two events have more in common than one might surmise from the above. Both highlight the growing problem of affordability of four-year degrees, and both have their roots in the notion that the traditional model of university education has become outdated and inefficient. In both cases, online education as a substitute for bricks-and-mortar lecture halls is/was touted as a solution. Continue reading
Two events, each with potentially great repercussions for public higher education, came out of the blue last week. While one – the ouster of the President of the University of Virginia – was closely followed nationally and on this campus, the other – the announcement of a “flexible degree” model offered through UW-System/ Extension that, in the words of the Governor’s office, “will transform higher education in Wisconsin” received somewhat less attention than one might expect.
And yet the similarities are striking. In both cases, changes in education at a renowned public university are supposed to be implemented virtually overnight to fix a host of vaguely defined problems. And in both cases, the magic cure is to be found in online teaching and in other unspecified educational technologies. Continue reading
The following disturbing message from the American Geophysical Union, a major professional organization, was passed on to S&W. If you value the participation of government scientists in the broader scientific community and, especially, in scientific conferences, then you should not only read this message, you should contact your representatives in the Senate to make your opinion known, as government employees do not have the freedom to do so themselves. (Links to the actual amendment language will be posted if and when they are made known to us.)
To put these restrictions into perspective, some of the most visible and respected scientists in the area of global climate change are NASA employees, and they could be limited in their ability to continue participating in important non-governmental scientific conferences related to this subject matter. Similar things can undoubtedly be said about scientists from other government organizations involved in health, environmental science, or technology.
Note that Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) is one of the co-sponsors of the amendment in question. – Editor Continue reading
The following was written by Judith Burstyn, professor of chemistry and former chair of the University Committee at UW-Madison. An abbreviated version appeared in today’s Chronicle of Higher Education. The full piece is reprinted here (and also at EduOptimists) in its entirety with her permission.
Apparently, at today’s University of Virginia, business values trump all. There is a troubling recent trend toward viewing all public institutions in market terms, where value is measured by dollars produced. In recent years, UW-Madison has felt this too, as some of our leaders focus on efficiency via new “flexibilities.” But universities are not businesses. The proper role of universities is the creation of knowledge for the public good, and education of the new generations of citizens and leaders for civil society. Business management approaches are ill suited to nurture the intellectual expansiveness that underlies great scholarship and deep learning. Reliance on narrow, industry-driven curricula simply won’t do. Great universities encompass a wide variety of disciplines, methods and perspectives, irrespective of the marketability of the knowledge they create. Nourishment of the young minds of our future leaders is invaluable to our country, and the University of Virginia and UW-Madison are shining examples of excellence in this regard. I worry that this excellence is at risk. Continue reading